Delta Tunnels Boondoggle
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Rss
Rage Against The Tunnels
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Latest News
  • Reports
  • Letters
  • Editorials
  • About
  • Contact

Water Bond is Circling the Drain–It’s not right for these times.

Posted on April 30, 2012 by SCWA in Recent News

Los Angeles Times

April 30, 2012 | George Skelton | Capitol Journal

The ballot measure, written in 2009, has some good ingredients but also some pork. It’s not right for these times.

SACRAMENTO — Might as well scratch one measure from the likely crowded November ballot: a pork-filled $11.1-billion water bond that is dying of its own weight.The Legislature produced this monster in late 2009 after years of wrangling by competing interests, culminated by an all-nighter in the Capitol.

Like the proverbial bar pickup, the bond wasn’t nearly as good-looking in daylight.

It had been slated for the 2010 ballot, but the Legislature and then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wisely delayed seeking voter approval until this year.

Now, about the only people who want to keep it on the November ballot are opponents who’d like to kill it for good.

“It’s the bond that can’t win and won’t be allowed to die,” Assembly Water Committee Chairman Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) told me.

Huffman prefers to either allow voters to deliver the fatal blow in November or that the Legislature take the bond off the ballot and bury it. Then, he says, “get to work on a better bond” that’s slimmer and includes regional water projects and Delta habitat restoration, but not dams.

That probably wouldn’t fly with the water buffaloes. They insist on tax-financed bond money to help build reservoirs, specifically the portion of reservoirs that stores water for public benefit, such as downstream fish habitat.

There’s a growing consensus that the bond should be yanked, shelved and reworked. Or reworked and shelved. The order of things seems to be the only debate.

Senate leader Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) is pushing for a rewrite this year and a public vote in 2014. But there’s little enthusiasm for rewriting now. Bond backers want to wait and measure voters’ mood closer to the 2014 election.

One problem for voters this year with an $11.1-billion water bond is that Sacramento is practically broke and has been whacking schools, college kids and the poor people’s safety net. Debt payments on the bond would cost an additional $777 million annually, give or take, for 30 years.

Another problem is California’s slumbering economy, which has slowed the state’s revenue stream and inspired voters to protect their wallets from anyone seeking government expansion.

“You couldn’t pass a bond this year that provided walkers for grandmothers,” says David Puglia, a longtime political operative who is senior vice president of Western Growers, a farm lobby that strongly supports a water bond.

Yet another political problem is Gov. Jerry Brown. He really doesn’t want the water bond on the November ballot, believing it would distract from his proposed tax increase. In fact, if the governor had his druthers, there’d be only one measure on the ballot: his.

A water bond — any infrastructure bond — normally doesn’t survive without a governor’s fully focused support, including aggressive fundraising.

“We’ve got a good, strong water governor, but he can’t make water his top priority this year,” says Tim Quinn, executive director of the Assn. of California Water Agencies. “Neither can the other political leadership.”

They’re fixated on the budget deficit, taxes and the elections.

“Right now, my attitude is wait until an off-election year when things are calmer,” Quinn continues. “We need to get the bond smaller, focus on high priority projects and make sure no one can argue that any pork is in it.”

That’s the biggest problem with this bond: the bloat that’s commonly defended by pork chefs, with a wink, as “projects of regional concern.”

The bond does have some good ingredients: $2.3 billion to repair and upgrade the stressed Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California’s main water hub; $3 billion potentially for two new dams; $1 billion for water recycling and well-water cleanup.

But there’s at least $2 billion worth of fatback and arguably much more.

It includes $455 million for “drought relief.” The drought ended two winters ago.

There’s $100 million for the Lake Tahoe watershed, which ultimately feeds Nevada. Some of the money would fuel a proposed Tahoe water taxi.

There is $100 million for the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and $100 million for Salton Sea restoration.

There are goodies spread all over the state — for bike trails, open-space purchases, “watershed education centers” and “climate change planning.”

Maybe these projects have some merit, but not enough in this economic and fiscal climate.

The excessive larding illustrates the payoffs often necessary to garner a two-thirds legislative vote on controversial issues. It becomes a vote-seller’s market.

Fortunately for California and Gov. Pat Brown, Jerry’s legendary father, only a majority vote was required when his historic water bond passed the Legislature in 1959. It probably couldn’t have achieved a two-thirds vote. And without that bond, it’s doubtful there ever would have been a State Water Project.

Search

In The News

  • Congressional Democrats demand resignation of Brown appointee

        Congressional Democrats demand resignation of Brown appointee April 25, 2013|By Anthony York SACRAMENTO — Five Congressional Democrats have...

    January 30, 2017
  • Farmers Try Political Force to Twist Open California’s Taps

    Few in agriculture have shaped the debate over water more than the several hundred owners of an arid finger of...

    January 28, 2017
  • Delta tunnels plan’s true price tag: As much as $67 billion

      By Paul Rogers  progers@mercurynews.com POSTED: 12/26/2013 05:16:14 AM PST | UPDATED: 20 DAYS AGO http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_24795356/delta-tunnels-plans-true-price-tag-much-67 For more than a...

    January 15, 2014
  • Delta water tunnel project needs $1.2 billion more for planning

        http://www.sacbee.com/2013/12/07/5978184/delta-water-tunnel-project-needs.html By Matt Weiser mweiser@sacbee.com Published: Saturday, Dec. 7, 2013 – 12:00 am Last Modified: Saturday, Dec. 7,...

    January 15, 2014
  • California Presses On With Water Project

    Environmental and Cost Concerns Persist as Draft Analysis Lays Out $25 Billion Plan to Bypass and Restore Delta By JIM CARLTON...

    December 10, 2013
  • Legislative analyst says cost of delta tunnels could outweigh benefits

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office told a Senate panel Tuesday that the projected economic benefits of a $16 billion plan to...

    August 15, 2013
  • Calls for new storage ignore need for reforms of how we use water

    Without significant movement toward sensible and overdue reforms, taxpayers would be foolish to pour more money into the same kinds...

    June 20, 2013
  • Fracking fuels water fights in nation’s dry spots

    Fracking fuels water fights in nation’s dry spots By GARANCE BURKE, Associated Press SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The latest domestic...

    June 17, 2013
  • Westside Toxic Soils to Be Used for Solar Farms

    LINK TO: Hanford Sentinel – May 31, 2013 Westside Toxic Soils to Be Used for Solar Farms instead of Polluting...

    June 7, 2013
  • Congressional Democrats demand resignation of Brown appointee

    “The controversy surrounds Jerry Meral, deputy director of the state Natural Resources Agency, who allegedly told officials that Brown’s water...

    April 25, 2013
  • Agency obscures facts for twin tunnels project

    The California fishing community agrees with Bee Executive Editor Joyce Terhaar’s assessment that the Department of Water Resources has made...

    March 3, 2013
  • Delta pipes pitch less than perfect

    SF Chronicle “On California Water” opined, The governor needs to forget the flannel shirt and embrace a plan that keeps...

    February 19, 2013
  • Deaths of endangered fish curtail water exports-So Cal Activists Launch Campaign Against Tunnel Tax & Higher Water Rates

    LA Times reported State and federal water managers have reduced exports to the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California after...

    February 13, 2013
  • MWD staff lives high on public’s dime

    This was MWD management seeking to reward itself and the agency’s rank-and-file employees while sending the bill to 19 million...

    February 11, 2013
  • MWD water agency debt for lifetime medical climbs to $545 million–Ratepayers Bilked

    Southern California’s largest water agency has accumulated an estimated $545 million in debt because of an uncommon retirement benefit it...

    February 1, 2013
  • A Better Idea, and Billions Cheaper

    A Better Idea, and Billions Cheaper But the concept of importing less and developing more local supplies is compelling..And more...

    January 20, 2013
  • Groundwater Basins – Our Earthquake Emergency Reservoirs Not Risky Tunnels

    We live with earthquakes. Relying on imported water does not make us more secure. Common sense and science tells us...

    January 20, 2013
  • Spending $14 billion to squeeze more water from a shrinking system is a gamble.

    Spending $14 billion to squeeze more water from a shrinking system is a gamble. Most importantly, this strategy is enormously...

    January 15, 2013
  • Governor’s delta plan is a big mistake: The State Needs to Reduce Water Exports from the Delta, Not Replumb it for More

    A combative Gov. Jerry Brown has announced his plan to dig two huge tunnels underneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta...

    January 9, 2013
  • A cautionary outlook for the water supply picture for the next half-century

    “The Study is noteworthy for its candid assessment of the possible impacts on water supply brought about by climate change...

    December 18, 2012

SCWA Letters

• The Environmental Assessment for Westlands Water District

• Community Groups Ask Senators 7 Questions—Policy Before Plumbing

• 37 Concerned Organizations Urge 2nd Look At Expensive Damaging Tunnels Project

• 39 Community Groups ask the Secretary of Interior for blueprints and operations plan before approval of the $20 to $50 billion giant water tunnels diversion project.

• Inflated promises of water

• Water Solutions Creating 1 MAF of Water Now—Congresswoman Napolitano

• Groups Seek SEC Investigation of Debt Issued

Broadcast News

• Highlights from PBS News Hour Broadcast –Plumbing Before Policy

• Metropolitan Water District spending questioned as water bills double

• Over Troubled Waters

• SoCal pays 75% of the cost might get 25% of benefits

• “Last Call at the Oasis”

• LADWP to increase rates 11 percent over 2 years as report reveals high employee salaries

• Listen to our Videos

Report Archives

• Westlands Avoid Paying Taxpayers Back for more than 50 years

• BigDumpConcretePipes Draft

• BigDumpConcretePipes U.S. Scientist Criticism

• Fiscal Games & Financial Shenanigans Can’t Hide True Ratepayer Costs of the Twin Tunnels Boondoggle

• Benefit – Cost Analysis of Delta Water Conveyance Tunnels Needed

• City of Los Angeles Sources of Water Supply

Join Us
Get More Info
Southern California Watershed Alliance © 2013