Delta Tunnels Boondoggle
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Rss
Rage Against The Tunnels
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Latest News
  • Reports
  • Letters
  • Editorials
  • About
  • Contact

Delta tunnels plan’s true price tag: As much as $67 billion

Posted on January 15, 2014 by SCWA in Recent News

logo-extra-large

 

By Paul Rogers

 progers@mercurynews.com

POSTED: 12/26/2013 05:16:14 AM PST | UPDATED: 20 DAYS AGO

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_24795356/delta-tunnels-plans-true-price-tag-much-67

For more than a year, Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration has been describing his plan to build two massive water tunnels through the Delta as a $25 billion project.

That would rank it as one of the largest public works plans in California history.

But when factoring in long-term financing costs, the price tag actually ranges from $51 billion to $67 billion, according to new figures that emerged last month.

While there’s nothing unusual about long-term debt to finance big projects, the new numbers suggest for the first time that the interest payments for the controversial water tunnels could be even more expensive than many traditional projects financed by bonds.

And since the water project relies on a higher percentage of financing than Brown’s other legacy project — high-speed rail — critics and supporters alike are questioning if California can afford the cost.

“The numbers are big. There is sticker shock,” said Jason Peltier, chief deputy general manager of the Westlands Water District, an agency in Fresno that provides water to farmers. “We keep going back to our policy people and saying ‘Yes, this is tough to look at, but consider your other scenarios. How much more groundwater can we pump?’ That kind of thing.”

The Brown administration has yet to provide a detailed breakdown of the overall 30-year cost of the project, even in a 34,000-page report on the tunnels it released last month.

The new cost figures were presented at a Westlands district board meeting last month by a Westlands staff member and a Citigroup bond consultant.

Mark Cowin, director of the state Department of Water Resources, confirmed the estimates are accurate.

“The assumptions they’ve made are reasonable,” he said. “But financing is confusing. There isn’t any doubt about it. It’s hard to relay information that the public understands. We need to be clear that if you add up the total debt service, that’s a different type of calculation than the capital cost estimate. I would hope those two types of estimates aren’t confused.”

The new details are significant for three reasons:

The overall cost for the tunnels is politically sensitive. State voters will be asked to approve a water bond to pay for parts of it in November, and polls have shown that the more government projects cost, the less likely voters are to support them. Water agencies around the state would sell bonds to pay for much of it also, and the higher the borrowing costs, the higher they will have to raise water rates on the public.

Many large public projects are funded with money from bonds. But the tunnels project would rely on bond borrowing to cover a huge percent of its costs: roughly 85 percent. By comparison, the financial plan for Brown’s other major project, high-speed rail, relies on state bonds for only 12 percent of its funding — $8 billion of the $68 billion price tag — with the rest, he hopes, to come from Congress, private companies and others.

A general rule for government bonds is that they double the cost of projects once interest is paid. But the borrowing costs for the tunnel project could cause its construction costs to more than triple, according to Westlands’ estimates. They include inflation, potential delays from lawsuits and techniques that water agencies could use in which they pay no interest or principal for the first few years, increasing the overall cost.

Financing charges are familiar to anyone buying a house or car. The interest costs help determine the monthly payments.

“You want to ultimately know what the total cost will be, in order to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the tunnels project versus other alternatives,” said attorney Doug Obegi, with the Natural Resources Defense Council in San Francisco. “Financing and debt service costs are significant. Ratepayers ultimately pay them.”

Critics say the state has deliberately tried to keep the grand total from the public as it tries to build political support for what is expected to be the biggest water battle in California in a generation.

“I think they are nervous about the total cost,” said Steve Kasower, a Sacramento economist who worked for the state Department of Water Resources from 1977 to 1985. “They have a reticence to put out a number because they feel people are going to get upset because it looks too expensive.”

The Westlands presentation looked at three scenarios. Each considered bonds issued for 30 years at 5 percent interest. They pegged the cost to build the tunnels at $18 billion, and overall cost with financing at $42 billion to $58 billion.

When the $9 billion more in wetlands restoration, monitoring and other costs are included, the grand total is $51 billion to $67 billion.

Brown’s plan is to build two tunnels, each 40 feet in diameter, running 35 miles under the Delta, and to restore 147,000 acres of wetlands and other habitat.

Supporters say the tunnels would make it easier to move water south without grinding up salmon, smelt and other fish in giant pumps at Tracy, which has caused federal officials in recent years to limit pumping. Environmentalists and Delta politicians call the project a water grab that could result in even more water being taken from the Delta. They say too many costs remain a mystery.

“We’re going to have to add a lot more detail to our finance plan,” Cowin acknowledged.

Asked when those details will be forthcoming, Cowin said he doesn’t know, because the state expects 70 percent of the project to be paid by water agencies — from the Santa Clara Valley Water District to farm water districts like Westlands to the powerful Metropolitan Water District in Los Angeles, who would issue revenue bonds — and they haven’t yet committed.

Cowin said he hopes the water agencies will agree to fund construction, and that state voters and Congress will pay for restoration so work can begin in 2017. Environmentalists say more water recycling, conservation and other measures are preferable. But Cowin said not building the project also comes with a price in future shortages.

“What are the costs if we don’t do it?” he said.

Paul Rogers covers resources and environmental issues. Contact him at 408-920-5045. Follow him at Twitter.com/PaulRogersSJMN.

Bay_Delta_Westlands_BDCP_DWR_Workshop_11-20-13_Powerpoint

Search

In The News

  • Congressional Democrats demand resignation of Brown appointee

        Congressional Democrats demand resignation of Brown appointee April 25, 2013|By Anthony York SACRAMENTO — Five Congressional Democrats have...

    January 30, 2017
  • Farmers Try Political Force to Twist Open California’s Taps

    Few in agriculture have shaped the debate over water more than the several hundred owners of an arid finger of...

    January 28, 2017
  • Delta tunnels plan’s true price tag: As much as $67 billion

      By Paul Rogers  progers@mercurynews.com POSTED: 12/26/2013 05:16:14 AM PST | UPDATED: 20 DAYS AGO http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_24795356/delta-tunnels-plans-true-price-tag-much-67 For more than a...

    January 15, 2014
  • Delta water tunnel project needs $1.2 billion more for planning

        http://www.sacbee.com/2013/12/07/5978184/delta-water-tunnel-project-needs.html By Matt Weiser mweiser@sacbee.com Published: Saturday, Dec. 7, 2013 – 12:00 am Last Modified: Saturday, Dec. 7,...

    January 15, 2014
  • California Presses On With Water Project

    Environmental and Cost Concerns Persist as Draft Analysis Lays Out $25 Billion Plan to Bypass and Restore Delta By JIM CARLTON...

    December 10, 2013
  • Legislative analyst says cost of delta tunnels could outweigh benefits

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office told a Senate panel Tuesday that the projected economic benefits of a $16 billion plan to...

    August 15, 2013
  • Calls for new storage ignore need for reforms of how we use water

    Without significant movement toward sensible and overdue reforms, taxpayers would be foolish to pour more money into the same kinds...

    June 20, 2013
  • Fracking fuels water fights in nation’s dry spots

    Fracking fuels water fights in nation’s dry spots By GARANCE BURKE, Associated Press SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The latest domestic...

    June 17, 2013
  • Westside Toxic Soils to Be Used for Solar Farms

    LINK TO: Hanford Sentinel – May 31, 2013 Westside Toxic Soils to Be Used for Solar Farms instead of Polluting...

    June 7, 2013
  • Congressional Democrats demand resignation of Brown appointee

    “The controversy surrounds Jerry Meral, deputy director of the state Natural Resources Agency, who allegedly told officials that Brown’s water...

    April 25, 2013
  • Agency obscures facts for twin tunnels project

    The California fishing community agrees with Bee Executive Editor Joyce Terhaar’s assessment that the Department of Water Resources has made...

    March 3, 2013
  • Delta pipes pitch less than perfect

    SF Chronicle “On California Water” opined, The governor needs to forget the flannel shirt and embrace a plan that keeps...

    February 19, 2013
  • Deaths of endangered fish curtail water exports-So Cal Activists Launch Campaign Against Tunnel Tax & Higher Water Rates

    LA Times reported State and federal water managers have reduced exports to the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California after...

    February 13, 2013
  • MWD staff lives high on public’s dime

    This was MWD management seeking to reward itself and the agency’s rank-and-file employees while sending the bill to 19 million...

    February 11, 2013
  • MWD water agency debt for lifetime medical climbs to $545 million–Ratepayers Bilked

    Southern California’s largest water agency has accumulated an estimated $545 million in debt because of an uncommon retirement benefit it...

    February 1, 2013
  • A Better Idea, and Billions Cheaper

    A Better Idea, and Billions Cheaper But the concept of importing less and developing more local supplies is compelling..And more...

    January 20, 2013
  • Groundwater Basins – Our Earthquake Emergency Reservoirs Not Risky Tunnels

    We live with earthquakes. Relying on imported water does not make us more secure. Common sense and science tells us...

    January 20, 2013
  • Spending $14 billion to squeeze more water from a shrinking system is a gamble.

    Spending $14 billion to squeeze more water from a shrinking system is a gamble. Most importantly, this strategy is enormously...

    January 15, 2013
  • Governor’s delta plan is a big mistake: The State Needs to Reduce Water Exports from the Delta, Not Replumb it for More

    A combative Gov. Jerry Brown has announced his plan to dig two huge tunnels underneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta...

    January 9, 2013
  • A cautionary outlook for the water supply picture for the next half-century

    “The Study is noteworthy for its candid assessment of the possible impacts on water supply brought about by climate change...

    December 18, 2012

SCWA Letters

• The Environmental Assessment for Westlands Water District

• Community Groups Ask Senators 7 Questions—Policy Before Plumbing

• 37 Concerned Organizations Urge 2nd Look At Expensive Damaging Tunnels Project

• 39 Community Groups ask the Secretary of Interior for blueprints and operations plan before approval of the $20 to $50 billion giant water tunnels diversion project.

• Inflated promises of water

• Water Solutions Creating 1 MAF of Water Now—Congresswoman Napolitano

• Groups Seek SEC Investigation of Debt Issued

Broadcast News

• Highlights from PBS News Hour Broadcast –Plumbing Before Policy

• Metropolitan Water District spending questioned as water bills double

• Over Troubled Waters

• SoCal pays 75% of the cost might get 25% of benefits

• “Last Call at the Oasis”

• LADWP to increase rates 11 percent over 2 years as report reveals high employee salaries

• Listen to our Videos

Report Archives

• Westlands Avoid Paying Taxpayers Back for more than 50 years

• BigDumpConcretePipes Draft

• BigDumpConcretePipes U.S. Scientist Criticism

• Fiscal Games & Financial Shenanigans Can’t Hide True Ratepayer Costs of the Twin Tunnels Boondoggle

• Benefit – Cost Analysis of Delta Water Conveyance Tunnels Needed

• City of Los Angeles Sources of Water Supply

Join Us
Get More Info
Southern California Watershed Alliance © 2013